Wlupping is authored wherever
Authonied by
the Imperial Acts but in Law 7 (Lameny &) it is authorised in
Cases in which it is not authorised
wkeily
in the Imperial Acts but it is omitter
^
in other cases in which it would seem
Equally reasonable to have allowest it
"In Law 4 § 64 the count is not empowered as in the conserponding section (76) of the Imperial Act to name the number of stones and the instrumentl in cases of whiffing. This omission Maybe accidental no it is not malle in Laws 7 and 8
77
Law 5 agcees with the consesponding Clauser dispersed through the Imperial
Ali
347
The draft of a desfalch by
Zou about whipping is marked in the Honghong bound volume 3 of 1862
N.B. us to number of lashes
Inflicted in
England &
The Acts of 24225 Vic
, as also the Colonial Law Auttionise the cohiffering
only of males under sixteen
By 25×25 he. C18
6 Vic.C18 (in casco
of summary couniction) the wheffing of offenders under fourtun is limited to 12 stroker with a brich rod. In other
cases the magistrate is left to name the number of strokes and the instrument
By the antigacotting act
信
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.